Alexander
the Great Tells History
<<
Previous
Why
was I considered to be Great?
Why
was I the last person to have earned that
moniker? After all, the Persian King Cyrus
– whom I admired greatly – and
the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses too were deemed
“great?”
Why
was my greatness recognized relatively shortly
after my death? During the Antiquity, Roman
Emperors already referred to me as Alexander
the Great. The little you do know of me
is based on secondary sources, which include
Plutarch, Ptolemy, Diodorus Siculus, Quintus
Curtius and Arrian of Nicomedia.
According to Plutarch, Julius Caesar himself
said:
“I
have not just cause to weep, when I consider
that Alexander at my age had conquered so
many nations, and I have all this time done
nothing that is memorable.”
He
wasn’t alone, for no one has ever
matched my industrious military conquests.
Until
my time, it was eastern cultures –
be it Persian, Egyptian or Babylonian –
that controlled the World. I changed
all of that. When I was alive, Greeks
dominated the landscape. Once I died,
my Empire crumbled but other Westerners
took over. Ever since, western thought
has prevailed over eastern ones.
Some historians cannot reconcile my life,
one ripe with contradictions. To many in
the Western World, I was a hero. To some
in the Eastern World, I was a villain. With
one swing of my sword, I displayed acts
of altruism. With another, I demonstrated
greed. Why? Was it an accident? Or did I
realize that only in such a manner would
I be able to accomplish what my father failed
to accomplish?
What
did he fail to accomplish? Not much, apart
from conquering Persia. This was to be my
destiny.
Many have attempted to tell my story throughout
history but have failed to present it through
my eyes.
For
the first time ever, you will hear my story
from my perspective.
Continue
>>
|