] HipMojo.com » Why Print Companies Make More Video Revenue that TV Firms Online

Interesting, but not shocking finding here.  This is the classic innovator’s dilemma / where some see a threat others see an opportunity kind of stuff.

A print company, be it a magazine or newspaper will see Web TV as purely new, opportunistic revenue; whereby a TV will see online video as a threat to a) the $75B TV advertising market and b) rich syndication revenue stream they enjoy.

This is surprising at first glance, a deeper examination suggests it makes sense.

In fact, not all print companies are well suited for a foray in video anyway, but for that, longer analysis click here.

I’m also going to publish our two cents on the “future of video advertising” sometime next week… check that out as well.

Tags: , , , , , , |
Posted By: Ashkan Karbasfrooshan | Feb 13th

One Response to “Why Print Companies Make More Video Revenue that TV Firms Online”

  1. Bennett Zucker Says:

    Yes … kind of like third world countries that missed out on building telecomms infrastructures and went directly to wireless.

    This is a nice boost for the battered newspaper industry, but it’s not a big surprise. Especially in markets where newspapers are teamed up with local broadcast or cable affiliates, many have been posting video stories and clips for years.

    For more on how the media companies are fighting their way back, take a look at: http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/13544.asp

Subscribe:


Leave a Reply

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image

Subscribe:


« « previous post | next post » »

Shortcut:
HipMojo.com

Subscribe:

Search Site:

Categories:

Archives:

Blogroll: