<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What Happened to Looksmart?  (Ask CNET)</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/11/08/what-happened-to-looksmart-ask-cnet/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/11/08/what-happened-to-looksmart-ask-cnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Wars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Looksmart]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
<category>CNET</category><category>Looksmart</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>Management</category><category>Rumors</category><category>Search Wars</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=2239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNET paid $20.5M for FindArticles last week and bought it from Looksmart, who made it official today.
CNET has about $50M in cash and has set up a $250M credit facility to buy more assets I presume.  They also just sold Webshots to American Greetings from some $45M.
I like CNET.  They&#8217;re a great mid-sized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET paid $20.5M for FindArticles last week and bought it from Looksmart, who made it official <a href="http://investor.shareholder.com/looksmart/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=274673" target="_blank">today</a>.</p>
<p>CNET has about $50M in cash and has set up a $250M credit facility to buy more assets I presume.  They also just sold Webshots to American Greetings from some $45M.</p>
<p>I like CNET.  They&#8217;re a great mid-sized web giant.  With a market cap of $1.1B, there&#8217;s good room to grow.  I used to own the stock but don&#8217;t now.</p>
<p>Anyway, I was going to email them and ask them this, but I doubt they would have answered, so here goes:</p>
<p>CNET owns a lot of good URLs, namely TV.com and Search.com.  They&#8217;re doing a lot with TV.com, not that much with Search.com.  In fact, Search.com is a meta search and their video search is powered by Truveo (disclaimer: Mojo Supreme has search products which include the MetaMojo.com vertical search and video meta search).  The problem with search is you need distribution.  You can have a great product but unless you have eyeballs conducting searches, no one cares.</p>
<p>So when CNET bought FindArticles, I asked: why not buy all of Looksmart for a dime more?  A look at the numbers further reinforces this question.</p>
<p>Looksmart has $54.85M in revenues in 2006, but <em>its entire market cap </em>is $54.99M.</p>
<p>Wait, it gets better: it has some $38.25M in cash and a whopping $89,000 in debt.</p>
<p>Bottom line: <strong>its enterprise value sits at a paltry $14.31M.  </strong></p>
<p>Mind you, Looksmart is not going to take over the world, but if CNET is going to pay $20.5M for FindArticles.com, why not just outright buy Looksmart and use it as your search unit proxy which right now is restricted to a great URL but a largely outsourced strategy?</p>
<p>So short of emailing CNET about this, I decided to inquire and guesstimate the answer to that question.</p>
<p>Sure, as a publicly traded company, I guess the market would have wanted more, but Looksmart has undertaken a very vertical search strategy.  This year Microsoft showed that vertical search has a place in the broad landscape by buying Medstory.  Thus, I ask, would Search.com&#8217;s meta search nature not complimented Looksmart quite well?  Or better yet, would Looksmart&#8217;s vertical focus not have fit well with Search.com&#8217;s meta search?</p>
<p>Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, CNET lacks proprietary search, right?  Did Looksmart not acquire Wisenut?  Wisenut, just a few years ago, was being spoken of in the same vein as Teoma, bought by Ask.com.  Teoma and Wisenut were actually referred to occasionally as Google killers (yes, I know, crazy now, and frankly, then, even though Google was a shadow of what it is today).</p>
<p>So, as I was writing in a stream of consciousness manner, I decided to actually check Wisenut.com before pressing publish.  Good thing I did.  Wisenut.com has ceased to exist.  Or, maybe the search technology now powers Looksmart.  So I went to Looksmart.  Good thing I did.  Nothing but 10 sponsored results.  Great.</p>
<p>Maybe the market is being generous with Looksmart?  To quote Henry Blodget: &#8220;Looksmart is frantically looking for a business.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think I know why CNET balked.  Looksmart is no more.  Here&#8217;s their business summary description:</p>
<blockquote><p>LookSmart, Ltd. operates as an online advertising and technology company in the  United States. It provides content, advertising, and technology solutions to  consumers, advertisers, and publishers. The company offers advertisers  pay-per-click search advertising and banners through a monitored ad distribution  network. Its ad distribution network includes proprietary Web sites, syndicated  publishers, other ad networks, and search partners. The company also offers a  suite of tools and solutions that help publishers improve their audience,  control advertiser relationships, and enhance the monetization of their sites.  It operates various consumer sites, which include FindArticles.com, a Web site  that enables consumers to search a database of content from various articles;  vertical search sites that select appropriate resources by category and deliver  relevant search results, including health, finance, entertainment, and auto; and  Furl.net, an online social bookmarking service, which enables members to  securely save Web pages. LookSmart was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in  San Francisco, California.</p></blockquote>
<p>The company has fully thrown in the towel on being a destination and has branched off into hundreds (thousands/millions) or really vertical search services.</p>
<p>Will the strategy pay off?  Well, their entreprise value is $14M.  I doubt the market thinks it will.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m speculating here, but I suspect that CNET in fact looked at buying all of Looksmart but probably passed.  But this begs the question: wouldn&#8217;t you buy $54M in annual revenues for an enterprise value of $14M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/11/08/what-happened-to-looksmart-ask-cnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
