<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Online Ads Continue to Grow in 2008, with Video Leading Jumping Most</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/12/online-ads-continue-to-grow-in-2008-with-video-leading-jumping-most/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/12/online-ads-continue-to-grow-in-2008-with-video-leading-jumping-most/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Video</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=2353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know who goes to greater lengths to make the web advertising space look bad: Valleywag or Silicon Alley - who along with Tech Crunch increasingly sound alike.  But that&#8217;s a separate point.
I saw a headline off Valleywag that read: Online advertising growth to slow next year.
Makes for a good headline, too bad the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know who goes to greater lengths to make the web advertising space look bad: Valleywag or Silicon Alley - who along with Tech Crunch increasingly sound alike.  But that&#8217;s a separate point.</p>
<p>I saw a headline off <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/the-chart/online-advertising-growth-to-slow-next-year-333263.php" target="_blank">Valleywag</a> that read: Online advertising growth to slow next year.</p>
<p>Makes for a good headline, too bad the interpretation and conclusion are both wrong.</p>
<p>For one, the graph Valleywag alludes to is eMarketer&#8217;s share of the online ad pie breakdown, and not growth rates:</p>
<p><img src="http://watchmojo.com/blogs/images/2011.jpg" /></p>
<p>Second, if you actually do the math, you see that 2007 to 2008 ad growth will come in at 28%, whereas 2006 to 2007 growth rates was a lower 26%.  But, this little slip-up notwithstanding, Valleywag remains a very good source of info and Nicholas Carlson has been a nice addition to the site&#8230; but this begs the question, what&#8217;s up with all of the online ad market hating of late (at least on VW and SAI, Tech Crunch seems to have become F*ckedcompany 2.0 - but that&#8217;s another post for another day)?</p>
<p>More importantly, you will notice the material jump in market share for video, but this is nothing we have not covered recently:</p>
<p>- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=2351" target="_blank">Video will surpass Search Ads by 2018</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog//?p=2344" target="_blank">Video vs. Search Ads - the looming war</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/12/online-ads-continue-to-grow-in-2008-with-video-leading-jumping-most/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
