<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What Video Ad Format Will Prevail and Dominate?</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/28/what-video-ad-format-will-prevail-and-dominate/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/28/what-video-ad-format-will-prevail-and-dominate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[WatchMojo.com]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Video</category><category>WatchMojo.com</category><category>YouTube</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/28/what-video-ad-format-will-prevail-and-dominate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NTV asks what the big ad format will be in online video.  No real surprises in what the panel answers.  Can&#8217;t blame them.
I think the dominant ad format will not be pre-roll or overlay, both are somewhat intrusive:
- The pre-roll is like the pop-up.  How much longevity did that have?
- Any decent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NTV <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/12/27/ntv-predictions-video-advertising/" target="_blank">asks </a>what the big ad format will be in online video.  No real surprises in what the panel answers.  Can&#8217;t blame them.</p>
<p>I think the dominant ad format will <u>not</u> be pre-roll or overlay, both are somewhat intrusive:</p>
<p>- The pre-roll is like the pop-up.  How much longevity did that have?<br />
- Any decent quality video will have some kind of caption in the lower 1/3 of the screen, and the overlay blocks it.</p>
<p>Much the same way Google (technically GoTo.com first) took simple little text ads (classifieds basically) and deployed them online, I think what will succeed in online video will be a throwback to something from offline media, this time TV.</p>
<p>What is that?</p>
<p>Just a guess, but what about the PiP.  That&#8217;s right, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picture-in-picture" target="_blank">Picture in Picture</a>.  I think it will work for a few reasons:</p>
<p>1 - a PiP ad format can technically stay on throughout the whole video, which I think is the only way video will surpass search advertising&#8217;s size.  I am not saying it has to remain throughout the whole period, but that would be far more effective.</p>
<p>2 - a PiP can be an image, short text or even, video.  If video is the killer app, should the killer ad format in the killer content format not include itself?  Expecting a video ad format to thrive with no video in it is akin to building a website out of a cardboard box and calling that interactive.</p>
<p>3 - Technically, you should be able to somehow make it expand to see the whole ad, so imagine if</p>
<p>- scrolling over with a mouse will make the PiP expand as an overlay with the full text;<br />
- a simple click will make the PiP load a video (I know, this might be irritating) and<br />
- a double click takes you to the client site.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not obvious but it could work, especially as viewers learn how the PiP works.</p>
<p>4 - Video content itself has expanded, at <a href="http://www.WatchMojo.com" target="_blank">WatchMojo.com</a>, for example, we publish in 480&#215;270 pixel sizes, so a PiP of 120&#215;90 would not really piss off too many users, I think&#8230; look at the image below.  I&#8217;ve noticed on our page on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/watchmojo" target="_blank">YouTube</a>, for example, that an overlay does cover up the caption that bears our text, so I do not think that is optimal, either.</p>
<p>5 - I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s very killer (in a good way) for the overlay to have to go somewhere, such as the lower 1/3 of the screen, whereas technically the PiP can go to the top, bottom, left or right.  With our content, for example, I&#8217;d probably put it on top, to the right.</p>
<p>See the black box, that&#8217;s what a 120&#215;90 PiP would look like in our 480&#215;270 publish format.</p>
<p><img src="http://watchmojo.com/blogs/images/pip.gif" /></p>
<p>That black box does not really take much away from the content, does it?  Then again, maybe I&#8217;ve had too much turkey this week, cause a Black Box is obtrusive&#8230; but a logo, text or image would be easier on the eyes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying no one has done this, I&#8217;m just saying no one has really fully executed this&#8230; and this is where I think the most upside is.</p>
<p>What do you think?  More importantly, if you wanna watch the video in question, click <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/index.php?id=5935" target="_blank">here</a>, it&#8217;s pretty funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/28/what-video-ad-format-will-prevail-and-dominate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
