<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Should CBS and Yahoo! Merge?</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/11/should-cbs-and-yahoo-merge/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/11/should-cbs-and-yahoo-merge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
<category>CBS</category><category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>Management</category><category>Rumors</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Yahoo!</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/11/should-cbs-and-yahoo-merge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, we&#8217;ve looked at many alternatives for Yahoo!&#8217;s Board, management, and shareholders (I am one).  Those options have thus far included:
- status quo (a $100B market cap by 2010?)
- merger with eBay
- merger with Viacom
- acquisition by/merger with Microsoft
- taken private
- sale to AT&#38;T
- can Google buy Yahoo!
But what about a merger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past, we&#8217;ve looked at many alternatives for Yahoo!&#8217;s Board, management, and shareholders (I am one).  Those options have thus far included:</p>
<p>- status quo (<a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/09/20/yahoo-100b-market-cap-by-2010/" target="_blank">a $100B market cap by 2010?</a>)<br />
- <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1714" target="_blank">merger with eBay</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/04/18/yhoo-let-one-rip-and-everyone-in-the-room-heard-it/" target="_blank">merger with Viacom</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1402" target="_blank">acquisition by/merger with Microsoft</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=640" target="_blank">taken private<br />
</a>- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/03/will-att-try-to-acquire-yahoo/" target="_blank">sale to AT&amp;T</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog//?p=1766" target="_blank">can Google buy Yahoo!</a></p>
<p>But what about a merger with CBS?  Sit down folks&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Yahoo! Is Undervalued </strong></p>
<p>The following is something I&#8217;ve touched on before, from the NYT&#8217;s Bits <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/yahoos-core-value-is-falling/" target="_blank">blog</a> by Saul Hansell:</p>
<blockquote><p>At $24.09, Thursday’s closing price, Yahoo has a market capitalization of $32 billion. When Jeffrey Lindsay, an analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein looks at the company’s $2 billion in cash, along with its holdings in Yahoo Japan, Alibaba (the Chinese e-commerce firm) and other entities it doesn’t run, he comes up with a value of $13.24 a share. That leaves a value of $10.51 a share for the actual business of Yahoo, making the value of Yahoo’s core business about $14 billion, or 7 percent of Google’s $200 billion market value.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Yahoo! Many Options</strong></p>
<p>Pontifications over Yahoo! are commonplace here, admittedly, but as the world wide web&#8217;s largest media company, we sure are interested.  Marketwatch.com <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/yahoo-microsoft-deal-would-face-hurdles/story.aspx?guid=%7B57D2DAE2%2D332F%2D4A43%2DA3A0%2DA65FEEEB7D17%7D&amp;dist=TQP_Mod_mktwN" target="_blank">mentions</a> that a MSFT/YHOO hookup would create distractions, WSJ&#8217;s Kara Swisher <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080111/microhoo-yabay-no-deal/" target="_blank">says</a> no way, Henry Blodget just wants to <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/01/microsoft-to-buy-yahoo-again.html" target="_blank">speculate</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Is Yahoo! is the Apple in CBS&#8217; Eye?</strong></p>
<p>Incidentally, at a net value of $14B, Yahoo! is worth pretty much what CBS is worth these days, net of cash.   CBS is valued at $16B, has about $2B of cash (though its enterprise value is more, at $23B, since it also has $7B in debt - enterprise value is simply market cap less cash plus debt).</p>
<p><strong>Should CBS and Yahoo! Merge?</strong></p>
<p>What does it mean that Yahoo! and CBS&#8217; net value are close.  Well, nothing.  But it is worth nothing that when CBS was a part of Viacom (before being spun-off), Viacom was always a likely acquisition/merger suitor.  Viacom remains a potential marriage partner for Yahoo!, but Yahoo! has gone from the world&#8217;s largest media property to much more with the acquisition of Flickr, Delicious, and numerous ad platforms (Right Media and Blue Lithium).  We argued that Yahoo! might want to <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/01/yahoo-should-spin-off-its-network-business-raise-proceeds/" target="_blank">spin-off</a> its Network business to raise cash and unleash shareholder value&#8230;</p>
<p>Yesterday, CBS Leslie Moonves <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-citi-media-les-moonves-ceo-cbs/" target="_blank">told</a> the investors at Citi’s 18th Annual Global Entertainment, Media &amp; Telecommunications Conference: “Our stock is undervalued.”</p>
<p>Frankly, with about $15B in annual sales, the man is not wrong.  With</p>
<p>- the world&#8217;s largest TV network (CBS),<br />
- the second largest radio network (after Clear Channel Communications)<br />
- the largest billboard business (CBS Outdoors)<br />
- one of the more impressive online networks, the CBS Audience Network, which basically launched this year,</p>
<p>the man has a point. Value is in the eye of the beholder, mind you, so wait, there&#8217;s more.</p>
<p><strong>Management Team</strong></p>
<p>Last year, Leslie Moonves wisely looked outside the Tiffany Network and hired Allen &amp; Co. investment banker Quincy Smith to become CBS Interactive&#8217;s CEO.</p>
<p>Smith is part banker, part Web guy (he was at Netscape when Netscape was a force).  Smith in turn lured Patrick Keane to become CBSI&#8217;s Chief Marketing Officer.  Keane has all of the online marketing DNA one needs, coming from Google.  Smith also recruited Michael Marquez, formerly of Yahoo!&#8217;s Corporate Development team.</p>
<p>Smith and Marquez&#8217; list of acquisitions, namely Wallstrip, Last.fm, along with business development deals with Digg, combined with their &#8220;distribution over destination&#8221; mantra have set the stage for CBSI and CBS&#8217; explosive growth.</p>
<p>In fact, meanwhile at Yahoo! they too have embraced &#8220;distribution over destination&#8221; so there is a joining of the minds there.</p>
<p>But, as the lines between old and new media blur and each company faces considerable competitive forces:</p>
<p>- CBS from a much larger NBC (parent is GE), News Corp., Viacom, Walt Disney and Time Warner<br />
- Yahoo! from MSFT&#8217;s  MSN.com,  Google, as well as News Corp.&#8217;s FIM/MySpace, Facebook, etc.</p>
<p>it is not a bad idea for them to consider what a merged entity would look like.</p>
<p>Let me be clear, the investment adage is &#8220;buy low sell high&#8221; - not &#8220;sell low&#8221; so admittedly, since both Yahoo! and CBS&#8217; stock prices being at or near 52-week lows, this might not fly with either board.  But, it&#8217;s not like one company is down and out or anything; both are doing great in the marketplace but are facing macro-challenges and facing difficulties in getting Wall Street excited.</p>
<p>As such, a joint entity is not implausible.  What&#8217;s more?  Well, with Terry Semel gone as CEO (he remains the Chairman of the Board) and Sumner Redstone not exactly plotting a succession plan, this allows for:</p>
<p>- Mr. Moonves to become Chairman of the joint Company&#8217;s Board and remain CEO of CBS<br />
- Jerry Yang to return to being Chief Yahoo<br />
- Quincy Smith can become CEO of Yahoo! and remain CEO of CBSI - for Yahoo! technically is CEO-less, even though Yang took over the job.</p>
<p>And assuming they are interested in such a premise, Keane, Marquez and the rest of the brass at CBSI can fill in some of YHOO&#8217;s recently departed ranks.</p>
<p>In turn, CBS/YHOO would definitely become the world&#8217;s best positioned media company - period.  If you think about it, Yahoo! has frequently <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/26/yahoo-goes-for-original-sports-content/" target="_blank">flirted</a> with the content business, but it has never prevailed.  Sometimes, the argument is to buy, not build&#8230; in this case, Yahoo! would be merging, instead&#8230; and CBS ensures its success and supremacy as marketing, advertising, media and content continue to transform and - to quote Quincy - become fully interactive.</p>
<p><strong>What Would the Combined Unit Look Like?</strong></p>
<p>For starters, Yahoo! needs to determine what to do with their stakes in Yahoo! Japan, Alibaba etc.  But those are all workable in a deal.  They could be spun-off if need be to raise more cash, which all companies can use to make acquisitions, buy back shares (especially since the stocks are close to their lows).  Saul Hansell&#8217;s post quotes Jeffrey Lindsay, an analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein, as saying that about $13 of Yahoo! $24 is really a holding company.  Over 1.32B shares outstanding, that means those spin-offs would generate $15-20B in cash for shareholders.  If the company wishes to retain those proceeds for investment, it adds to the war chest.</p>
<p>Depending on these admittedly important details, the CBS/Yahoo! company would have about:</p>
<p>- $4-20B of cash on hand,<br />
- a combined market cap of $30-50B (depending on the issue raised above)<br />
- revenues of over $20B<br />
- would have an awesome arsenal of assets.</p>
<p>From a purely financial engineering perspective, it&#8217;s worth noting (again) that CBS is currently trading at 1x Revenues.  Yahoo! meanwhile is trading at 5x.  This merged entity will approximate the P/S somewhere around 2-3x&#8230; so right there, there will be a boon for investors. The same applies to profits, to varying degrees.</p>
<p><strong>Technology vs. Media</strong></p>
<p>Bear in mind, search is important and Yahoo! should continue to focus on that, but focusing on yesterday&#8217;s growth engine is foolish when Yahoo! is already well positioned for the next growth engines in online advertising (namely video and display/banner ads).  Partnering with CBS - which is home to a lot of great content - gives Yahoo! an edge with regards to  distribution and monetization.  The former because of both companies&#8217; &#8220;distribution over destination&#8221; ideology and the latter because Yahoo! has the best sales force in online media and CBS&#8217; has arguably the best sales force in offline media.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>We do not, for one second, think this will happen&#8230; but the implications would create a very powerful entity that would push News Corp., NBC, Walt Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, Google, Microsoft back and bring together a team that can certainly create a lot of shareholder value.</p>
<p>Any takers?</p>
<p>Disclaimer: Long YHOO stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/11/should-cbs-and-yahoo-merge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
