<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Memo to Yahoo!: Barbarians at the Gates</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/memo-to-yahoo-barbarians-at-the-gates/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/memo-to-yahoo-barbarians-at-the-gates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>Management</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Rumors</category><category>Yahoo!</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/memo-to-yahoo-barbarians-at-the-gates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning I saw BreakingViews.com&#8217;s take on Yahoo!, via Valleywag via Paul Kedrosky, which builds upon Sanford Bernstein&#8217;s report that Yahoo! is not exactly maximizing value.
I have been covering Yahoo! (note: I own shares in the company) for some time and outlined my own strategic options, which include:
- status quo (a $100B market cap by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I saw <a href="http://www.breakingviews.com/2008/01/11/Yahoo.aspx?e=c0iWrY0CQ2pmiFG" target="_blank">BreakingViews.com</a>&#8217;s take on Yahoo!, via <a href="http://valleywag.com/346303/" target="_blank">Valleywag</a> via <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2008/01/17/yahoo_estimatin.html" target="_blank">Paul Kedrosky</a>, which builds upon Sanford Bernstein&#8217;s report that Yahoo! is not exactly maximizing value.</p>
<p>I have been covering Yahoo! (note: I own shares in the company) for some time and outlined my own strategic options, which include:</p>
<p>- status quo (<a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/09/20/yahoo-100b-market-cap-by-2010/" target="_blank">a $100B market cap by 2010?</a>)<br />
- <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1714" target="_blank">merger with eBay</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/04/18/yhoo-let-one-rip-and-everyone-in-the-room-heard-it/" target="_blank">merger with Viacom</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/11/should-cbs-and-yahoo-merge/" target="_blank">merger with CBS </a><br />
- <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1402" target="_blank">acquisition by/merger with Microsoft</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=640" target="_blank">taken private<br />
</a>- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/03/will-att-try-to-acquire-yahoo/" target="_blank">sale to AT&amp;T</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog//?p=1766" target="_blank">can Google buy Yahoo!?</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/01/yahoo-should-spin-off-its-network-business-raise-proceeds/ " target="_blank">Spin off ad network unit</a></p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;ve argued that Yahoo!&#8217;s main problem is simply operating in the shadow of Google, but I digress, Wall Street does know best and Yahoo!&#8217;s stock is in the gutter.  Jerry Yang is a great guy, I am sure, but 200 days into his stint, something needs to change.</p>
<p>The chorus is growing louder, the momentum is growing fast: something is bound to happen in 2008, especially at these prices.   Yahoo! is now worth $28B.  That&#8217;s nothing to sneeze at, but then start to peel off the layers and something is wrong.</p>
<p>In the past month, more and more people are pointing out the obvious.</p>
<p>In December 2007, Valleywag <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/stocks/is-yahoo-really-worthless-334959.php" target="_blank">asked</a> &#8220;Is Yahoo really worthless&#8221; and highlighted:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yahoo Japan, of which Yahoo owns a third, is worth $25 billion, putting Yahoo&#8217;s stake in it at nearly $9 billion. Alibaba.com, a Chinese e-commerce company in which Yahoo directly owns a 10 percent stake, is worth $17 billion. Tack another $1.7 billion on. That figure doesn&#8217;t include Alibaba.com&#8217;s parent company, Alibaba Group, which runs Yahoo China and in which Yahoo owns a currently illliquid 40 percent stake. Estimates of its value are running between $8 billion and $16 billion. Yahoo has other investments like G-Market. Add it up, and you realize that Yahoo&#8217;s wholly owned operations in America and Europe are valued by the market at next to nothing, especially compared to the multiples other Web companies are getting.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then in early January (cause we&#8217;re obviously now in &#8220;mid-January), Sanford C. Bernstein added:</p>
<blockquote><p>At $24.09, Thursday January 10th’s closing price, Yahoo has a market capitalization of $32 billion. When Jeffrey Lindsay, an analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein looks at the company’s $2 billion in cash, along with its holdings in Yahoo Japan, Alibaba (the Chinese e-commerce firm) and other entities it doesn’t run, he comes up with a value of $13.24 a share. That leaves a value of $10.51 a share for the actual business of Yahoo, making the value of Yahoo’s core business about $14 billion, or 7 percent of Google’s $200 billion market value.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yahoo! is yesterday hit a 52-week low.  Yes, I know, the economy.  No one is immune to the economy, granted, but the counter thought is that there is always a bull market somewhere, and <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=2032" target="_blank">digital media is it</a>, and <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/03/display-advertising-revenues-to-accelerate-yahoo-to-dominate/" target="_blank">display/banners and video will grow above average</a> and this all means Yahoo! should too.</p>
<p>Yahoo! will face a shareholder revolt in the form of a hostile takeover some time in 2008.  It might not be very hostile, frankly, because many of Yahoo!&#8217;s most senior shareholders have left, including its Chairman and former CEO Terry Semel.  Furthermore, Yahoo!&#8217;s current CEO, co-founder Jerry Yang is the largest single individual shareholder and unlikely to want the chief Chief gig for very long.</p>
<p>What will happen in particular?  I don&#8217;t know.  But seeing Jana Partners et al. circle CNET and build up a 20%+ stake off the radar I suspect the same thing with Yahoo!, soon.</p>
<p>Any takers?</p>
<p>Disclaimer: Long YHOO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/memo-to-yahoo-barbarians-at-the-gates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
