<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Network vs. Property: Heavy.com vs. Break.com Case Study</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/28/network-vs-property-heavycom-vs-breakcom-case-study/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/28/network-vs-property-heavycom-vs-breakcom-case-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Heavy.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Break]]></category>
<category>Break</category><category>Heavy.com</category><category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Video</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/28/network-vs-property-heavycom-vs-breakcom-case-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Break.com - one of the many sites vying for #3 in the video file sharing social network space - just decided to veer into new territory by taking on Heavy.com, a broadband media company, by launching an ad network targeting men 18-34.
TechCrunch reports that CEO is expecting rates of $10-30 CPM.  Break.com has a sales [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Break.com - one of the many sites <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/11/23/online-video-distribution-the-race-for-3-is-on/" target="_blank">vying for #3</a> in the video file sharing social network space - just decided to veer into new territory by taking on Heavy.com, a broadband media company, by <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/28/breakcom-launches-ad-network-for-dudes/" target="_blank">launching</a> an ad network targeting men 18-34.</p>
<p>TechCrunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/28/breakcom-launches-ad-network-for-dudes/" target="_blank">reports</a> that CEO is expecting rates of $10-30 CPM.  Break.com has a sales force of 15, expect all of the players in the space (Metacafe, DailyMotion, Veoh etc.) to ramp up sales teams as online video advertising crosses $1B in expenditures in 2008 - and potentially <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/12/11/video-ads-to-surpass-search-ads-by-2018/" target="_blank">surpass</a> search ads by 2018.</p>
<p>The challenge for many of these sites has been to handpick advertiser-friendly content on their sites, which is pretty slim in some cases (disclosure: <a href="http://www.WatchMojo.com" target="_blank">WatchMojo.com</a> is a content provider of such safe content on many of these sites - more on this <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/11/23/building-the-most-valuable-apps-on-the-most-valuable-networks/" target="_blank">here</a>) so the concept of launching an ad network is not only in vogue (AOL&#8217;s Platform A, Yahoo!&#8217;s acquisition of Right Media and Blue Lithium, etc.) but a requirement to remain viable and not get drowned by the Google/YouTube and News Corp./MySpace tidal wave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/28/network-vs-property-heavycom-vs-breakcom-case-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
