<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdoch: +$900M is better than -$45B</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/04/rupert-murdoch-900m-is-better-than-45b/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/04/rupert-murdoch-900m-is-better-than-45b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Wars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stat of the Day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Corp./FIM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
<category>Google</category><category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>MySpace</category><category>News Corp./FIM</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Search Wars</category><category>Stat of the Day</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Yahoo!</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/04/rupert-murdoch-900m-is-better-than-45b/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch confirmed during News Corp.&#8217;s analyst call that he was not planning on bidding on Yahoo!
No wonder: Google is guaranteeing him $900M via Fox Interactive Media.  Yahoo! used to power those very same text ads via Overture and when the deal came up for the right to power MySpace&#8217;s search, Yahoo! did not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch confirmed during News Corp.&#8217;s analyst call that he was not planning on bidding on Yahoo!</p>
<p>No wonder: Google is guaranteeing him $900M via Fox Interactive Media.  Yahoo! used to power those very same text ads via Overture and when the deal came up for the right to power MySpace&#8217;s search, Yahoo! did not even lobby for the business.</p>
<p>Translation: Yahoo! would never be able to generate that kind of return for him.</p>
<p>Does Murdoch wish he could get all of Yahoo! for 25% of MySpace?  Of course.</p>
<p>But is he crazy to trade off $900M in guaranteed revenue from Google to instead acquire Yahoo! for $45B?</p>
<p>Are <em>you</em> crazy?  Frankly, Murdoch is so smart that he welcomes a MSFT acquisition of YHOO.  Why?  Because it makes Google price MySpace&#8217;s inventory at a premium.</p>
<p>Update: I am relinking to a post I did when the deal was announced analyzing <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/did-google-overpay-for-fox-interactive-medias-search-business/" target="_blank">whether or not Google overpaid</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/04/rupert-murdoch-900m-is-better-than-45b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
