<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Viacom Yearns for the Smell of Napalm</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/viacom-yearns-for-the-smell-of-napalm/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/viacom-yearns-for-the-smell-of-napalm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Management</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Video</category><category>YouTube</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/viacom-yearns-for-the-smell-of-napalm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viacom has some of the strongest brands around.  But these days, the only thing that is stronger than their brands is the foul smell emanating from their strategy&#8217;s skid marks.  I should probably be praising the virtues of Viacom&#8217;s strategies (note: plural) because it&#8217;s the kind of company that might one day want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom has some of the strongest brands around.  But these days, the only thing that is stronger than their brands is the foul smell emanating from their strategy&#8217;s skid marks.  I should probably be praising the virtues of Viacom&#8217;s strategies (note: plural) because it&#8217;s the kind of company that might one day want to acquire a company like WatchMojo.com, but who are we kidding, Viacom is all over the place (full disclaimer: it&#8217;s only fair to admit that I actually contacted them in 2006 about a strategic investment in WatchMojo.com when their rival News Corp. was suing me for <em>breathing </em>- today, News Corp. is a partner of ours by virtue of WatchMojo.com providing video to their MySpace TV unit - I know, go figure).</p>
<p>Anyway, speaking of smells, media companies ought to take a cue from <em>Apocalypse Now</em>, a movie in which Airmobile Infantry Colonel Kilgore declared &#8220;I love the smell of napalm in the morning&#8230; It smells like&#8230; victory&#8221; following a nearby napalm strike.</p>
<p><em>Apocalypse Now </em>was distributed by Paramount, which is incidentally owned by Viacom.  That&#8217;s probably just a coincidence, because Viacom has had very few victories to speak of.</p>
<p>For a company as rich and well-positioned to dominate online, there&#8217;s nothing victorious smelling about Viacom&#8217;s strategy.  Let&#8217;s count the many ways.</p>
<p>Viacom bought iFilm for a mere $49M.  They bought Atom Entertainment for $200M.  Between iFilm&#8217;s prowess in videos and Atom&#8217;s in animated movies, Viacom ought to be cleaning house in broadband entertainment, but all they seem to have to showcase is a disastrous $1B lawsuit against Google, who has more money than God.</p>
<p>Well, maybe not God, but at least more money than Viacom.  Most importantly, as Viacom&#8217;s programming becomes forgotten and stale (thanks to an ill-fated writers&#8217; strike where they showed why media moguls are media moguls), YouTube today commands the world&#8217;s attention when it comes to web video.</p>
<p>Today Viacom is <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9870641-7.html" target="_blank">brandying</a> a new strategy.  We won&#8217;t even take the time to dissect it, because come springtime - you know, when <em>successful </em>companies smell napalm - Viacom will have changed it and will be hawking something else.</p>
<p>Related:</p>
<p>- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/01/07/viacoms-double-whammy-killing-mtv-and-losing-myspace/" target="_blank">Viacom messes up MTV, loses MySpace</a><br />
- <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/09/07/cbs-and-viacom-becoming-opposites/" target="_blank">Viacom vs. CBS - what was Sumner Redstone thinking </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/viacom-yearns-for-the-smell-of-napalm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
