<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Too Little, Too Late - Yahoo!&#8217;s Problem: No Credibility</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/03/18/too-little-too-late-yahoos-problem-no-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/03/18/too-little-too-late-yahoos-problem-no-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Investing</category><category>Legal Matters</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Yahoo!</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/03/18/too-little-too-late-yahoos-problem-no-credibility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! lobbies shareholder.  Not sure I am convinced.
On September 2007, I suggested that Yahoo! could be a $100B market cap company by 2010.  But to do that, the best route would be to go private, clean up shop and then come back stronger.
Going private, I argued, would shelter YHOO from the demands and short-term focus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! <a href="http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/press/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=300145" target="_blank">lobbies</a> shareholder.  Not sure I am convinced.</p>
<p>On September 2007, I suggested that Yahoo! could be a <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2007/09/20/yahoo-100b-market-cap-by-2010/" target="_blank">$100B market cap company by 2010</a>.  But to do that, the best route would be to go private, clean up shop and then come back stronger.</p>
<p>Going private, I argued, would shelter YHOO from the demands and short-term focus of Wall Street.  Most importantly, it would avoid the non-stop benchmarking to Google, who at the time especially was flirting with all-time highs as a much higher growth investment opportunity exposed to online advertising and search.</p>
<p>To get to the $100B market cap figure, I used numbers from a previous analysis I did all the way back in October 2006 which <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2006/10/30/take-yahoo-private-triple-your-money-in-four-years/" target="_blank">projected a range of revenues for 2010</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Analysis</strong>Let’s look at the numbers:</p>
<p><strong>US Revenues</strong></p>
<p>If US online advertising becomes a $25 to $32 billion industry.  For simplicity’s sake, we’ll say the US online advertising industry will generate $30 billion in 2010.</p>
<p>Even with search getting 40% of that figure and Yahoo! trailing Google, Yahoo! will easily be able to earn anywhere from 15 to 30% of the total pie in the US (It will get 18% this year).</p>
<p>At 15% of a $30 billion online US ad industry, Yahoo!’s revenues will be $4.5B in the US alone.  That’s just in America, and that’s at the lower range of 15%.  If Yahoo! can a) make up market share in search and b) maintain/grow its lead in display, video and other formats of online advertising, it can generate 30%, that’s $9 billion.  Google will generate 25% in 2006 of the total US ad industry and that’s just off search.</p>
<p>That’s in 2010, four years from now, when anything is possible.  Google today logged in 25% of US online ad fueled largey by search alone.  So for Yahoo! to go from a market share in search of 30% to 35% (for example) and improve monetization through Panama, then it is not inconceivable for it to hit 25% or 30% of US advertising dollars if its display/banners and video grows (forget all subscription revenues).</p>
<p><strong>International Revenues</strong></p>
<p>And, that’s just the US.  In Q2, Yahoo! international revenues grew 38% globally versus 27% domestically in the US.  I always project online revenues to be 1 to 1 for US versus international.  So you can double those numbers by two:</p>
<p><u><strong>Yahoo! could be generating revenues of $9 to $18 billion in 2010</strong></u>; its profit margin was 24% and 36% in 2004 and 2005 respectively.</p>
<p>Say it can maintain margins of 25% (hey, they won’t be hiring as aggressively as Google and there is only so much purple paint out there), this means that it can be generating profits of $2.5 to $5 billion per year, at a P/E of 25 (it’s now at 33 today), that’s a market cap of $62.5 billion to $125 billion in 2010, or an average of $93.75 billion.</p>
<p>With those kinds of revenues and margins, it will have more than $10 billion in cash, so a market cap of just over $100 billion.</p>
<p>Right now, Yahoo! is worth $36 billion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Toda, in an effort to lobby shareholders to maintain independence, Yahoo! projects revenues of $8.8B by 2010 - or half of what Google did in 2007.  I am not trying to rain on Yahoo!&#8217;s parade, but this is exactly what we shareholders have been complaining about: too little, too late.</p>
<p>Do not get me wrong, there is nothing per se wrong with projecting an $8.8B a year franchise&#8230;  my problem is that Yahoo! has no credibility left.  I would maybe consider believing this if upper management was changed and enough Board members changed to bring in a new dynamic.</p>
<p>Note: Long YHOO - albeit <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/03/12/why-i-sold-875-of-my-yahoo-shares/" target="_blank">lighter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/03/18/too-little-too-late-yahoos-problem-no-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
