<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Time Warner: a Modern Day Fiefdom</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/04/28/time-warner-a-modern-day-fiefdom/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/04/28/time-warner-a-modern-day-fiefdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TW AOL]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Management</category><category>TW AOL</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/04/28/time-warner-a-modern-day-fiefdom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t understand why Warner Bros. is looking to develop its own destination.  Forget the fact that there are other destinations doing that pretty well already&#8230; why doesn&#8217;t WB use Time Warner&#8217;s online assets, like SI, Time, and&#8230; AOL, or Bebo!
TWX is one odd company: last night I mentioned how AOL and CNN don&#8217;t seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Warner Bros. is <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/the_wb_really_coming_back_sort_of" target="_blank">looking</a> to develop its own destination.  Forget the fact that there are other destinations doing that pretty well already&#8230; why doesn&#8217;t WB use Time Warner&#8217;s online assets, like SI, Time, and&#8230; AOL, or Bebo!</p>
<p>TWX is one odd company: last night I <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/04/27/cnnaol-silo-speaks-volumes/" target="_blank">mentioned</a> how AOL and CNN don&#8217;t seem to talk, add this to one more unit living in a silo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/04/28/time-warner-a-modern-day-fiefdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
