<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Will MSFT and Big Media Become Relevant on the Web?</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/03/will-msft-and-big-media-become-relevant-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/03/will-msft-and-big-media-become-relevant-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Corp./FIM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TW AOL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
<category>CBS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Management</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>NBC</category><category>News Corp./FIM</category><category>TW AOL</category><category>Yahoo!</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/03/will-msft-and-big-media-become-relevant-on-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I read the headline: &#8220;U.S. Internet will shrink to 2 strong players: report&#8221;
I thought: &#8220;this is why we pay analysts?&#8221; - thinking the two giants in question were Google and Microsoft (post YHOO acquisition).  But, clicking on the link I realized they meant Google and Amazon:
Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Jeffrey Lindsay argues in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read the headline: &#8220;U.S. Internet will shrink to 2 strong players: report&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought: &#8220;this is why we pay analysts?&#8221; - thinking the two giants in question were Google and Microsoft (post YHOO acquisition).  But, clicking on the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN0232735820080603" target="_blank">link</a> I realized they meant Google and Amazon:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Jeffrey Lindsay argues in a 310-page report entitled &#8220;U.S. Internet: The End of the Beginning&#8221; to be published on Tuesday that Google and Amazon are best placed to withstand the current economic downturn.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_1"></span>&#8220;We expect two players to continue to perform strongly, Google and Amazon,&#8221; Lindsay writes. &#8220;Both Google and Amazon.com are still racking up annual growth rates in the 30-40 percent range, with only a relatively modest slowdown in sight.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I am not sure about this not because Google or Amazon.com won&#8217;t be dominant, but long-term,</p>
<p><strong>1- Big Media</strong></p>
<p>a media company will be less clueless and opportunistic enough to make a dent and become a force online.  The Web is not really an altogether stand alone universe, it&#8217;s another medium&#8230; and someone will do the right thing.  If history and track record are an indication, it won&#8217;t be NBC Universal or Disney, but News Corp. or CBS have a shot.  Mind you, when Time Warner sold to AOL (yep, technically, AOL bought TWX in that merger), some people thought it was prescient; only after the fact did everyone say &#8220;idiots&#8221;.  Ok, maybe lots of TWX staffers thought it was dumb.  That shell shock explains why traditional media - while a likely player in the race - might not win the new media race.</p>
<p><strong>2- MSFT&#8217;s $100B investment in the Web.</strong></p>
<p>People, MSFT gushes $1B of free cash flow per month, and that figure is growing.  It was about to spend some $40-50B to acquire YHOO.  I think MSFT will eventually buy MSFT (though details will remain messy due to Jerry Yang and YHOO&#8217;s board criminal behavior), and the only exit I see for Facebook is MSFT.  Right there, you are looking at $60B.</p>
<p>Considering that MSFT has already spent nearly $10B developing MSN.com and Live.com, along with a $400M purchase of Hotmail.com and hmm&#8230; a $6 <em>billion </em><a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1571" target="_blank">acquisition of aQuantive</a>&#8230; by the time Redmond is done, I think it will have spent $100B in building a Web division that creates as much revenue as Windows and Office do.</p>
<p>So long term, nothing against AMZN or GOOG, but don&#8217;t count out Big Software or Big Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/03/will-msft-and-big-media-become-relevant-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
