<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Yahoo!&#8217;s Been Neutered</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/28/yahoos-been-neutered/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/28/yahoos-been-neutered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Wars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>Management</category><category>Search Wars</category><category>Yahoo!</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/28/yahoos-been-neutered/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Parker would be proud, I tell ya.
Yahoo! just lost another &#8220;key exec&#8221;, claims Tech Crunch.  This time, some M&#38;A guy named Kent Goldman.  If you are an M&#38;A executive at Yahoo! now, you get more deal flow than&#8230;  The point is: no one in their right mind is looking at selling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Parker would be proud, I tell ya.</p>
<p>Yahoo! just lost another &#8220;key exec&#8221;, claims <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/27/yahoo-loses-one-of-their-top-deal-guys-one-more-exec-gone/" target="_blank">Tech Crunch</a>.  This time, some M&amp;A guy named Kent Goldman.  If you are an M&amp;A executive at Yahoo! now, you get more deal flow than&#8230;  The point is: no one in their right mind is looking at selling to Yahoo!  Why?  Because no one was rushing to get on the Titanic once it hit theat infamous iceberg.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Yahoo! isn&#8217;t in the market to buy anyone, because they are too busy with doing a re-org every month&#8230; oh, they&#8217;re also getting in and out of markets on the turn of a dime.</p>
<p>What makes this really ironic is that a lot of people - namely VCs looking to flip otherwise useless and exitless startups - were against MSFT buying YHOO because it would lead to one less buying party.</p>
<p>This, I thought was nonsense, because when a company that is not strong in an area (MSFT/Web) buys a company that is strong in one area (Web, allegedly) but lacks financial firepower (cash, strong stock) then the buying party uses the selling party as a platform to buy more companies.</p>
<p>In other words, MSFT has the cash but not the slightest clue what to do with some companies&#8230; whereas YHOO lacks the cash but has a clue (all right, maybe not anymore) about what to do with web startups.</p>
<p>All things being equal, adding a small web startup to MSFT is not as bright as adding a web startup to YHOO because YHOO is more of a pureplay Web company whereas MSFT is a software firm first and foremost just trying to find its bearings online.</p>
<p>In fact, I could be wrong, but I see CBS using CNET to make more acquisitions for largely similar reasons.  CBS is a great media company - albeit a traditional one where its audiences are getting too old for marketers to care about - in shrinking business segments.  Sure, it bough Wallstrip, Last.fm and a few other such companies&#8230; but it cannot get all that aggressive with your typical Web startup.  Having however spent $1.8B on CNET, it can now use its balance sheet and cash flow to leverage CNET&#8217;s audience and more Web oriented business nature to make more acquisitions.</p>
<p>Indeed, we&#8217;ve seen this before: when News Corp. bought MySpace and IGN, it did not clam up and put away the checkbook, subsequently buying up Photobucket, Flektor, Strategic Data Corp. and a number of other companies.</p>
<p>The CBS example is fitting, by the way, because Goldman is the second Yahoo! executive to leave the company; Mike Marquez left YHOO to join CBS.  I am pretty sure that he&#8217;s seen more M&amp;A activity at CBS in that timespan than Yahoo! has.</p>
<p>But of course, in the near sighted world some people live in, MSFT buying YHOO was a bad thing.  Tell that to YHOO stockholders who are today holding a stock that is 50% lower than where it was a month ago, before Yang et al. totally sank the company&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/06/28/yahoos-been-neutered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
