<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Content With M&#038;A Without VC</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/22/content-with-ma-without-vc/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/22/content-with-ma-without-vc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&#038;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
<category>Blogs</category><category>Entrepreneurship</category><category>Financing</category><category>GigaOm</category><category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>M&amp;#038;A</category><category>Management</category><category>om malik</category><category>Startups</category><category>Video</category><category>Wireless</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/22/content-with-ma-without-vc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title has a double meaning, of course.
From Tech Crunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington, on GigaOm&#8217;s acquisition of a wireless blog:
I’m sticking to my argument that blogs should get cash positive and then start to acquire others - raising a slug of money just gives people an incentive to spend it, and you lose control to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title has a double meaning, of course.</p>
<p>From Tech Crunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington, on GigaOm&#8217;s <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/22/gigaom-buys-a-mobile-blog-the-beginning-of-the-blog-rollup/" target="_blank">acquisition</a> of a wireless blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’m sticking to my argument that blogs should get cash positive and then start to acquire others - raising a slug of money just gives people an incentive to spend it, and you lose control to a group of investors who may know little or nothing about how to build a blog.</p></blockquote>
<p>Replace blog with any content site and I agree whole-heartedly.  It&#8217;s nothing against VCs, but let them stick to technology startups&#8230; they&#8217;re doing a helluva great job at that, after all.</p>
<p>I think Arrington at some point tried to raise VC and realized that it would be imprudent, and he&#8217;s now wiser for it.  Sort of like someone I know.</p>
<p>Congrats to Om and his team for the acquisition though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/22/content-with-ma-without-vc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
