<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Economists Agree: UGC Isn&#8217;t Worth a Warm Bucket of Spit</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/economists-agree-ugc-isnt-worth-a-warm-bucket-of-spit/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/economists-agree-ugc-isnt-worth-a-warm-bucket-of-spit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stat of the Day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TV Networks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Stat of the Day</category><category>TV Networks</category><category>Video</category><category>YouTube</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/economists-agree-ugc-isnt-worth-a-warm-bucket-of-spit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data from Diffusion Group, found via TVWeek, via Alley Insider:
Today&#8217;s average:
Professional long form video: $40 CPM
Professional short-form: $30 CPM
User-generated video: $15 CPM
Projected for 2013:
Long form: $46 CPM
Short form: $34 CPM
User-gen: $17 CPM
States SAI&#8217;s Michael Learmonth:
We&#8217;ve heard YouTube is having trouble getting even $15 for overlay ads on the few videos it can actually sell.
All this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data from <a href="http://www.tdgresearch.com/" target="_blank">Diffusion Group</a>, found via <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/07/column_a_silver_lining_for_web.php" target="_blank">TVWeek</a>, via <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/7/report-video-ad-rates-pretty-high-going-higher" target="_blank">Alley Insider</a>:</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s average:<br />
Professional long form video: $40 CPM<br />
Professional short-form: $30 CPM<br />
User-generated video: $15 CPM</p>
<p>Projected for 2013:<br />
Long form: $46 CPM<br />
Short form: $34 CPM<br />
User-gen: $17 CPM</p>
<p>States SAI&#8217;s <span class="byline">Michael Learmonth:</span></p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve heard YouTube is having trouble getting even $15 for overlay ads on the few videos it can actually sell.</p>
<p>All this could change next year if advertisers embrace user-generated video or long form video ad rates go down a bit and become more comparable with TV. Still, these seem like reasonable benchmarks.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael is a smart guy, but he&#8217;s downright high if he believes that (in his defense, he says &#8220;if&#8221; and not &#8220;when&#8221;), and steadfast, Diffusion is plain wrong for basic economic reasons, mainly:</p>
<p>There is NO way that UGC will fetch rates anywhere near what Diffusion is projecting&#8230; for one, advertisers won&#8217;t go near it and won&#8217;t touch it with a ten-foot pole&#8230; Most importantly, the sheer supply of UGC is 100 times larger than that of short form professional content, so the price for that will be much higher than simply 2 times UGC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/economists-agree-ugc-isnt-worth-a-warm-bucket-of-spit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
