<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Two 2009 Advertising Stories to Follow</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/12/14/two-2009-advertising-stories-to-follow/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/12/14/two-2009-advertising-stories-to-follow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Facebook.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist.org]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Procter and Gamble]]></category>
<category>Craigslist.org</category><category>Facebook.com</category><category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Procter and Gamble</category><category>Social Networking</category><category>Video</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/12/14/two-2009-advertising-stories-to-follow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1 - Why does everything have to be ad-supported?  Certainly not social networks. 
I don&#8217;t think social networking sites lend themselves to advertising.  The NYT has a story about a lackluster P&#38;G/Facebook campaign.  I&#8217;ve covered this theme on this blog, but in essence, social networking is about communications, and every other communications form on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1 - Why does everything have to be ad-supported?  Certainly not social networks. </strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think social networking sites lend themselves to advertising.  The NYT has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/business/media/14digi.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">story</a> about a lackluster P&amp;G/Facebook campaign.  I&#8217;ve covered this theme on this blog, but in essence, social networking is about communications, and every other communications form on the Web - be it email, message boards or chats - have not proven to be cash cows with regards to advertising.  Social networks will be no different.</p>
<p><strong>2 - Monetizing video streams awfully reminiscent to monetizing search queries.</strong></p>
<p>In 2000, I worked in the search engine space.  We all knew that a search query was a valuable action, but we didn&#8217;t know how valuable.  Google borrowed GoTo&#8217;s model and the rest is history.  While search conveys intent, video (and content in general) conveys interest.</p>
<p>I think video as a business model in 2009 will be awfully similar to 2001 when search as a business model took off.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/12/14/two-2009-advertising-stories-to-follow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
