<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HipMojo.com</title>
	<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog</link>
	<description>Covering Online Video, Web, Search, Investing, Technology, Strategy, Investing, M&#038;A, Financing, VCs</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Why Twitter Reminds Me of Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2009/03/01/why-twitter-reminds-me-of-wikipedia/</link>
		<comments>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2009/03/01/why-twitter-reminds-me-of-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet &#038; Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
<category>Internet &amp;#038; Web</category><category>Management</category><category>Social Networking</category><category>Twitter</category><category>Wikipedia</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2009/03/01/why-twitter-reminds-me-of-wikipedia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has been compared to everything from Facebook, to YouTube, and even Google.  But the more I read about where the company is headed, the more I think: Wikipedia.  The actual comparisons to Wikipedia are more numerous but less obvious than you think (users creating the content, in real time, etc.).  But reading VC Todd [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/ashkan" target="_blank">Twitter</a> has been compared to everything from Facebook, to YouTube, and even Google.  But the more I read about where the company is headed, the more I think: Wikipedia.  The actual comparisons to Wikipedia are more numerous but less obvious than you think (users creating the content, in real time, etc.).  But reading VC Todd Sagres&#8217; cavalier <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_vc_laughs_at_the_idea.php " target="_blank">take</a> on Twitter&#8217;s obvious but opaque revenue model, I wonder: will Twitter be something that could have been worth billions but whose value will lie outside of its proprietary ecosystem?</p>
<p>Wikipedia grew because it was a non-profit, open source encyclopedia.  Similarly, Twitter grew (amongst other reasons) because it was a free and its API spawned a thousand of products and services (some/many more useful than itself).  So I wonder, if history repeats itself, the Twitter guys might feel a bit like Jimbo Wales does these days: proud of his accomplishment but a bit regretful of not having captured the value that he created.</p>
<p>Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2009/03/01/why-twitter-reminds-me-of-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
