Top 10 Dark Truths About the Royal Family

Top 10 Dark Truths About the Royal Family

Welcome to MsMojo, and today we’re counting down very unsettling aspects of the British Royal family through the years.

#10: Media Relations

The Royal Family's relationship with the media has been fraught with tension and controversy. Historically, this relationship oscillated between periods of cooperative engagements and open hostility. The scrutiny intensified following events like the divorce of Prince Charles and Princess Diana, where the media's role was particularly criticized. Diana's tragic death in 1997, attributed partly to paparazzi chasing her car, notably worsened attitudes towards the press across the board. The Family's approach has often involved legal actions against publications for breaches of privacy, highlighting an ongoing struggle to control their narrative and manage invasive media practices.

#9: Colonial Past

The history of the monarchy is inextricably entwined with the history of the British Empire, which at its peak was the largest empire in history, with vast territories across the globe. The royal role involved sanctioning and sometimes directly participating in the colonial administration. This empire was built on the control and exploitation of numerous countries and peoples, leading to significant cultural, social, and economic impacts on colonized regions. The legacy of this colonial past includes widespread debate about historical injustices, including slavery and the suppression of native cultures and political systems. These historical actions and their ongoing repercussions are subjects of intense scrutiny and reevaluation today.

#8: Racism

Emerging from the aforementioned colonial reckoning, in modern times the Royal Family has also faced accusations of racism. This came to prominence most notably during Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. The couple revealed conversations within the Family about the potential skin color of their son, Archie, and this revelation sparked widespread media coverage and public debate. The interview brought to light longstanding concerns about institutional racism and the approach to diversity and inclusion. These allegations have prompted discussions about the monarchy's need to both address and reform its attitudes and policies regarding race and discrimination in a more transparent, progressive manner.

#7: Political Power & Influence

The line between the symbolic and the substantive in terms of political influence has long been a source of intrigue. While their official role in modern times is ostensibly one of neutrality, whispers of behind-the-scenes influence linger. Historically, monarchs wielded considerable political power. Queen Victoria, for instance, despite the rise of a constitutional monarchy, was known to exert influence on policy through her personal relationship with Prime Ministers like Benjamin Disraeli. The 20th century did see a marked decline in direct political power, and today, the influence seems more subtle. Weekly meetings with the Prime Minister offer a platform for the King or Queen to share their insights and experiences, potentially swaying policy through quiet persuasion.

#6: Secrecy

Ironically, the one thing that there’s no mystery about when it comes to the Royal Family is that it thrives on mystique. Shrouded in secrecy, their lives are a carefully curated public image. From residences like Buckingham Palace to personal finances, details are closely guarded. This culture of privacy fuels widespread fascination, with glimpses into royal life treated as rare treasures. This opaqueness can breed suspicion, as seen with the brouhaha over the Princess of Wales’ extended absence from view in 2024. Critics argue a monarchy in the 21st century needs more transparency, while others defend the right to a private life.

#5: Financial Support

Public funding is a highly contentious issue, particularly during times of economic hardship. The Sovereign Grant, an annual sum paid by the Treasury, finances the upkeep of palaces, travel, and staff salaries. While there is revenue generated through tourism and the Crown Estate (a vast portfolio of lands and holdings), critics argue this doesn't justify the taxpayer burden. Transparency surrounding the true cost of the monarchy is also a concern. Security expenses, for example, are not fully disclosed, leading some to believe the actual cost is higher than reported. The debate over taxpayer funding reflects a broader questioning of the monarchy's relevance in modern society.

#4: The Crown Jewels

While the British Crown Jewels dazzle with their brilliance, their history is far from sparkling.
Gems like the famed Koh-i-Noor diamond, meaning "Mountain of Light," originated in India. However, Britain's claim to it stems from a disputed treaty, with many arguing it was stolen under duress. Similar questions surround the Cullinan diamonds, the largest ever discovered, which arrived in British hands during a period of brutal colonial wars in South Africa. These treasures represent not just immense wealth, but a complex and often violent past marked by conquest and displacement. Today, the ownership of these jewels remains a contentious issue, with some countries demanding their return.

#3: Scandals

In a counterpoint to their air of tradition, the royals' lineage is steeped in scandal. Henry VIII's marital mayhem - six wives, two beheaded - shocked Europe. Centuries later, whispers surrounded Queen Victoria's close friendship with a Scottish servant, John Brown. The 20th century saw a king's abdication rock the monarchy. Edward VIII, smitten with American divorcee Wallis Simpson, chose love over the crown in 1936, forever altering the line of succession. Princess Margaret, the Queen's fiery sister, courted controversy with her flamboyant lifestyle. More recently, Prince Charles's affair with Camilla Parker Bowles and, particularly, Prince Andrew's reported association with Jeffrey Epstein, tarnished the institution’s image.

#2: Misogynistic Succession Laws

The line to the British throne has been meticulously charted for centuries, ensuring a smooth transfer of power. These laws, of course, haven't been fair or progressive. Traditionally, a system called male-preference primogeniture held sway. This meant the eldest son, regardless of the age of his sisters, would become king. This practice, rooted in a desire to maintain a clear line of succession and avoid disputes, persisted for generations. However, the tides began to turn in the 21st century. Public opinion and evolving societal norms cast a critical eye on gender-based bias. In 2011, the Commonwealth realms, including the United Kingdom, came together for the Perth Agreement. This historic accord aimed to modernize succession laws.

#1: The Gilded Cage

While the crown promises prestige, it exacts a heavy toll on personal freedoms. Royal protocol dictates every aspect of life, from dress codes to interactions with citizens. This constant scrutiny and control can be stifling. Princess Diana's struggles with isolation within the monarchy became a stark reminder of the mental health toll such restrictions can have. The pressure to conform and the lack of autonomy can leave royals feeling like carefully curated figures rather than individuals. This is a complex issue, as some may find comfort in the structure, while others might prioritize personal growth and independence, potentially leading to a clash with tradition.

What other dark truths could have made this list? Let us know in the comments.