WatchMojo

Login Now!

OR   Sign in with Google   Sign in with Facebook
advertisememt

Top 20 MORE Rip Off Songs

Top 20 MORE Rip Off Songs
VOICE OVER: Rebecca Brayton WRITTEN BY: Andy Hammersmith
Coming up with new beats is hard! For this list, we'll be looking at notable tracks that were considered similar enough to warrant the threat of a legal action or an actual lawsuit. Our countdown includes artists David Bowie, Madonna, Lil Nas X and more!

Welcome to WatchMojo, and today we’re counting down our picks for the Top 20 More Rip-Off Songs. For this list, we’ll be looking at notable tracks that were considered similar enough to warrant the threat of a legal action or an actual lawsuit. Did we forget a song considered a rip-off? Let us know in the comments below.

#20: “Boys Keep Swinging” by David Bowie (1979) vs. “M.O.R.” by Blur (1997)

In an homage to David Bowie, the Britpop band Blur took a few cues from the legend’s work on the “Lodger” album. Their single “M.O.R.” bears a close resemblance to Bowie’s song “Boys Keep Swinging.” Most of the music revolves around the same chord progression. The basic musical idea originated from Bowie and producer Brian Eno’s experiments in the late 1970s, which also included the similar sounding “Fantastic Voyage.” Damon Albarn and his bandmates boldly saluted the music icons and eventually had to give them credit. Following some legal efforts, the songwriting team for this track received an adjustment.

#19: “Healthy” by The Raisens (Unreleased) vs. “Truth Hurts” by Lizzo (2017)

Lizzo has seen tremendous success with hits like “Truth Hurts.” The empowering anthem allows the artist to showcase her independence in iconic lines. But it resulted in an accusation that the singer lifted a key line from Twitter, along with separate assertions regarding proper songwriting credit. Justin and Jeremiah Raisen claimed that their demo “Healthy” was the basis for this track. The brothers said that they worked with the artist on the idea, which allegedly shares lyrical and musical similarities with her eventual single. Lawyers denied this connection, but credit was later given to Mina Lioness for inventing the “100% that bitch” mantra in a tweet. Lizzo also sued the Raisens for apparently harassing her about their authorship claims.

#18: “Sunrise” by Yeasayer (2007) vs. “Pray for Me” by The Weeknd & Kendrick Lamar (2018)


Collaborating for the soundtrack of “Black Panther,” The Weeknd and Kendrick Lamar recorded the song “Pray for Me.” The track prompted the band Yeasayer to sue for copyright infringement. Claiming that the work borrows from their single “Sunrise,” the rock group says that there’s a comparable vocal part in both efforts. The act even argued that the accused artists replicated aspects of the original recording for their own benefit. Pushing back against the allegations, The Weeknd and Lamar asserted their innocence. Two years after the newer composition’s release, Yeasayer ended the lawsuit and left the songwriters with full credit.

#17: “Baby Can I Hold You” by Tracy Chapman (1988) vs. “Sorry” by Nicki Minaj feat. Nas (2018)

For her track “Sorry,” Nicki Minaj wanted to use a sample of Tracy Chapman’s classic 1988 song “Baby Can I Hold You.” Minaj went ahead with the production despite Chapman denying her request. When Minaj’s 2018 effort was leaked, the original singer/songwriter sued in an attempt to stop the new composition from being released. A judge ultimately decided that Minaj’s work could be considered fair use. The entire lawsuit came to a close in 2021, with the rapper paying $450,000 to Chapman. After all of the hassle, “Sorry” mostly remains famous for this copyright dispute.

#16: “Long as You Know You’re Living Yours” by Keith Jarrett (1974) vs. “Gaucho” by Steely Dan (1980)

Jazz rock legends Steely Dan are known for their epic compositions and complex structures, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t also inspired by their contemporaries. Keith Jarrett’s “Long as You Know You’re Living Yours” is all over their track “Gaucho” and singer Donald Fagen later mentioned being inspired by it. Jarrett naturally filed suit after hearing similar musical elements in the 1980 release. Along with a familiar tempo, they each implement a signature saxophone line. Both songs undoubtedly come from the same cloth in a way that even casual listeners could decipher. Following a legal battle, the plaintiff was awarded a co-writing credit.

#15: “Security of the First World” by Public Enemy (1988) vs. “Justify My Love” by Madonna (1990)

If you happen to be a fan of Madonna’s “Justify My Love,” you may or may not be aware of the Public Enemy song “Security of the First World.” The introductory section of the pop singer’s hit sounds almost identical to the rap group’s instrumental. The hip-hop collective argued that the 1990 single sampled their beat, but the songwriter Lenny Kravitz never admitted to consciously taking it. Producer Hank Shocklee said that his drum pattern was taken from him without permission and considered a lawsuit. A counter-argument said that it was just inspired by an earlier James Brown work, but Shocklee asserted that it was original. The battle ultimately never became more than a few back and forth remarks in the press.

#14: “We Run Things” by Flourgon (1988) vs. “We Can’t Stop” by Miley Cyrus (2013)

The early 2010s saw the return of Miley Cyrus as a pop star, releasing the hugely successful single “We Can’t Stop.” Some of the lyrics involve a line that singer Flourgon recognized. With a few basic differences, both tracks share the same central idea. The Jamaican singer felt it was too close to his own song “We Run Things” and followed up with a massive lawsuit. He initially hoped to receive damages in the neighborhood of $300 million. After Cyrus agreed to settle, the artist also known as Michael May won an unknown amount of money.

#13: “Carry On” by Bobby Caldwell (1982) vs. “Carry On” by Lil Nas X (2018)

Lil Nas X is one of the boldest and most provocative artists of his era. He’s also been embroiled in multiple cases of copyright infringement, with this one being lesser known than the attention surrounding his hit “Old Town Road.” The single “Carry On” borrows more than just a title from Bobby Caldwell’s song of the same name. Once the publishers of the older singer found out about it, they promptly served the rapper with a multi-million dollar lawsuit. The younger performer allegedly didn’t ask for permission before releasing the track on his mixtape “Nasaratti.” As of mid-2023, the pending suit still hadn’t been resolved.

#12: “Creep” by Radiohead (1992) vs. “Get Free” by Lana Del Rey (2014)

Radiohead was sued for plagiarizing part of their breakthrough hit “Creep,” but that didn’t stop their publishers from going after Lana Del Rey for chord structure similarities between “Creep” and “Get Free.” The publishers stated that they were merely asking for the writers of “Creep” to be added as co-authors. The singer said she made an offer to them for a percentage of the royalties, but the rock act allegedly attempted to take away all of it for themselves. The suit was later settled, according to the “Get Free” performer. While some of these events are still unclear, there hasn’t been any subsequent change to the credits for Del Rey’s track.

#11: “Shadows of the Night” by Pat Benatar (1984) vs. “No Reins” by Rascal Flatts (2007)

After songwriter D.L. Byron heard the Rascal Flatts’ track “No Reins,” he was convinced that the group had taken a cue from one of his biggest works. The author of Pat Benatar’s “Shadows of the Night” felt that the songs were too similar to be a coincidence. Byron then sued the country group, feeling that the trio reinterpreted the chorus for their own tune. Representatives for one of the bandmates released a statement that denied any alleged plagiarism of the 1984 hit. Listeners will likely find themselves siding with the Benatar collaborator after hearing the introduction of the more recent release. All these years later, it seems that there hasn’t yet been a proper end to the lawsuit.

#10: “Take a Dive” by Bryan Pringle (1999) vs. “I Gotta Feeling” by Black Eyed Peas (2009)

Unknown songwriter Bryan Pringle alleged that a version of his track “Take a Dive” was used for the Black Eyed Peas smash “I Gotta Feeling.” According to the musician, he sent a copy to Interscope Records and somehow the songwriters got hold of it. It’s never been proven whether or not it ever got into the hands of producer David Guetta or any of the band members. Regardless of the questionable accusations, the plaintiff tried to make a case that revolved around the repetitive guitar riff. Pringle’s work features a similar sound that he hoped would be surefire evidence in court. Unfortunately for his case, there wasn’t sufficient evidence to move forward and the claim was dismissed.

#9: “Boogie Chillen’” by John Lee Hooker (1948) vs. “La Grange” by ZZ Top (1973)


When you’re dealing with the blues, it’s not uncommon to find patterns between songs. This was the case with ZZ Top’s classic single “La Grange.” The publisher for John Lee Hooker’s track “Boogie Chillen’” asserted that the two were especially close, filing a lawsuit against the band as a result. It’s undeniable that the blues legend inspired countless artists. In the case of ZZ Top, a case could be argued that they subconsciously used Hooker’s riff. The reality of the situation was that the music was considered public domain for its origins. Unable to convince the proper authorities, the suit was officially dropped in 1995.

#8: “Eighties” by Killing Joke (1984) vs. “Come as You Are” by Nirvana (1992)


Following the release of their album “Nevermind,” Nirvana shot to fame and even received scrutiny for their songs. Such was the case for their single “Come as You Are.” British group Killing Joke thought the grunge band ripped off their guitar riff, leading to the threat of legal action. There was definitely a potential case to be argued with the help of musicologists. After the death of Kurt Cobain, the possible suit didn’t go forward, with the plaintiffs looking to move on with their lives. All that remains is the knowledge that Cobain himself knew the two pieces were perhaps too similar.

#7: “Love Is a Wonderful Thing” by The Isley Brothers (1966) vs. “Love Is a Wonderful Thing” by Michael Bolton (1991)


Singer Michael Bolton was known to revisit soul classics and invent a few of his own. For his track “Love Is a Wonderful Thing,” the performer claimed to have no knowledge of the song of the same name by The Isley Brothers. The R&B group sued on the basis of plagiarism for more than just the title. What followed was an almost decade-long event that included failed appeals on the part of Bolton. Ultimately, the courts ruled in favor of the Brothers and awarded them millions in royalties. It was considered one of the most significant payouts in music copyright history.

#6: “Taj Mahal” by Jorge Ben Jor (1972) vs. “Do Ya Think I’m Sexy?” by Rod Stewart (1978)


When Rod Stewart went disco in the late 1970s, he apparently did so with the help of Jorge Ben Jor’s music. The latter’s song “Taj Mahal” provided the basis for the unforgettable “Do Ya Think I’m Sexy?” Ben Jor sued the British rocker, noting that the melody in the chorus is eerily close to the one in his own track. Rather than letting it become a drawn out case, the former “Faces” frontman did the honorable thing. Stewart admitted that he’d heard the other tune before and subconsciously swiped it for his own number. The profits for the pop tune were donated to UNICEF, giving this lawsuit one of the happier endings in music history.

#5: “If You Could Read My Mind” by Gordon Lightfoot (1970) vs. “The Greatest Love of All” by Whitney Houston (1986)


One of Canada’s greatest songwriters, Gordon Lightfoot’s legacy stretches much further than some people might think. His DNA may or may not have inspired the producer Michael Masser on his composition “The Greatest Love of All.” Famously covered by Whitney Houston, the track features a vocal melody that’s fairly close to the one in “If You Could Read My Mind.” Lightfoot sued Masser for allegedly borrowing several bars of his 1970 song. The folk hero eventually gave up on the lawsuit, later realizing that Houston was being unfairly lumped into a dispute that wasn’t her fault.

#4: “Pour Some Sugar on Me” by Def Leppard (1987) vs. “Midnight Memories” by One Direction (2014)


While the groups seem like a world away, Def Leppard and One Direction have one alleged connection. The former’s single “Pour Some Sugar on Me” could be a possible inspiration for the pop act’s “Midnight Memories.” Many audiences found the choruses to have more than a passing resemblance, with the hard rock band considering a lawsuit. The writers of the 1987 classic decided to stop short of any official legal proceedings. Guitarist Vivian Campbell felt that the songs were both indebted to the blues, adding that there wasn’t much reason to pursue such a common concept. The younger quintet’s embrace of rock sounds ended up being a success in its own right.

#3: “Every Breath You Take” by The Police (1983) vs. “I’ll Be Missing You” by Puff Daddy & Faith Evans (1997)


If you want to sample a song by Sting, you should probably ask him first. P. Diddy, then known as Puff Daddy, didn’t get permission and paid the price for it. There’s no question that the Bad Boy producer took the main guitar part from The Police wholesale. Used in a touching tribute to Biggie Smalls, the iconic arpeggio was the perfect inclusion to the hit rap single. The frontman for the 1980s band sued and won all of the track’s royalties. You’d imagine that this would’ve created a lot of animosity between Sting and Diddy, but they eventually became unlikely friends.

#2: “Let’s Get It On” by Marvin Gaye (1973) vs. “Thinking Out Loud” by Ed Sheeran (2014)


Considering the scope of Marvin Gaye’s contributions to music, it’s not hard to imagine that many artists are constantly inspired by his output. Those in charge of his rights have been known to scrutinize high-profile singles that have any similarities with Gaye’s catalog. In the case of Ed Sheeran’s “Thinking Out Loud,” some felt that it was too close to the classic hit “Let’s Get It On.” Potential lawsuits were drawn up, dismissed, and reworked over the years. The trial finally went forward in 2023, at which point Sheeran was cleared of any potential infringement. With both songs using a comparable chord structure, the final ruling bodes well for pop stars that have faced accusations of consciously or unconsciously stealing from others.

#1: “Taurus” by Spirit (1968) vs. “Stairway to Heaven” by Led Zeppelin (1971)

Arguably the most lauded rock composition ever, “Stairway to Heaven” is the epic of all epic songs in its respective genre. Led Zeppelin and fellow rockers Spirit were in close enough proximity that they would’ve been exposed to each other’s music. The latter band had an instrumental called “Taurus,” which has a guitar part that’s not unlike the beginning of Zeppelin’s track. They sued for copyright infringement in 2014, entering into a multi-year war over the rightful authorship of “Stairway.” Robert Plant and Jimmy Page seemingly didn’t have a memory of the plaintiff’s music and ultimately the powers-that-be sided with the more famous musicians.

Comments
advertisememt